Discussion of movies and ReelThoughts topics

It is currently Thu Jun 20, 2013 1:30 am





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
THE INNKEEPERS 
Author Message
Site Admin

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:55 pm
Posts: 2800
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ, USA
Post THE INNKEEPERS
Click here for the review of The Innkeepers

SPOILERS must be tagged with the "SPOILER" tag!


Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:16 pm
Profile WWW
Director

Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 7:44 pm
Posts: 1190
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
did you see(or like) House of the Devil?

was excited to see this, but have heard from a number of people that the comedic elements play too big an aspect in the film(which the trailer doesn't hint at at all)


Thu Feb 02, 2012 1:59 pm
Profile
Second Unit Director

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:13 am
Posts: 328
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
The comedic elements don't dilute the suspense of the film. The humor is low-key and allows the viewer to become invested in the characters. I would say the film is almost like "Clerks" meets the "Shining." James' review is pretty on target. The major reason why this film is "small" is that you're expecting it to build to a major revelation regarding a secondary character, which the movie doesn't fulfill. Regarding characters acting dumb:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
I imagine your'e referring to the fact that Sarah Paxton goes into the cellar instead of escaping the motel, despite the fact that she knows that the ghosts are most likely to be lurking down there.



I think this movie seems to have been made for the on-demand format. If I were to see this on the big screen, I would probably feel unsatisfied, but on the small screen it is a great way to spend an hour and forty minutes on a weekend evening.


Thu Feb 02, 2012 3:58 pm
Profile
Site Admin

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:55 pm
Posts: 2800
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ, USA
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
jadedmoviegoer wrote:
Regarding characters acting dumb:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
I imagine you're referring to the fact that Sarah Paxton goes into the cellar instead of escaping the motel, despite the fact that she knows that the ghosts are most likely to be lurking down there.


That's it.


Thu Feb 02, 2012 4:20 pm
Profile WWW
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
James Berardinelli wrote:
jadedmoviegoer wrote:
Regarding characters acting dumb:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
I imagine you're referring to the fact that Sarah Paxton goes into the cellar instead of escaping the motel, despite the fact that she knows that the ghosts are most likely to be lurking down there.


That's it.

Did the film paint Paxton's character as one that is curious to the point of recklessness? If not, then that is indeed a disappointing moment.


Thu Feb 02, 2012 5:09 pm
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
James Berardinelli wrote:
jadedmoviegoer wrote:
Regarding characters acting dumb:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
I imagine you're referring to the fact that Sarah Paxton goes into the cellar instead of escaping the motel, despite the fact that she knows that the ghosts are most likely to be lurking down there.


That's it.


Actually, I don't think it was dumb, and my following explanation explains it.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Well, actually, wasn't Sarah looking for Rease Jones? She opened the basement door to call to her, and when she turned around she saw the ghost of the old man and fell down the stairs. Then she was trapped down there. Would you want to go back up the stairs when you just saw a dead person behind you. She also new at the end of the basement was a way out to the street.


Thu Feb 02, 2012 7:41 pm
Gaffer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:54 am
Posts: 10
Location: Switzerland
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
calvero wrote:
did you see(or like) House of the Devil?


House of the Devil was a great horror movie. If "The Innkeepers" is as good (or better) than "House of the Devil", I definitely have to see this.


Fri Feb 03, 2012 2:11 am
Profile
Second Unit Director

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:13 am
Posts: 328
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
roastbeef_ajus wrote:
James Berardinelli wrote:
jadedmoviegoer wrote:
Regarding characters acting dumb:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
I imagine you're referring to the fact that Sarah Paxton goes into the cellar instead of escaping the motel, despite the fact that she knows that the ghosts are most likely to be lurking down there.


That's it.


Actually, I don't think it was dumb, and my following explanation explains it.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Well, actually, wasn't Sarah looking for Rease Jones? She opened the basement door to call to her, and when she turned around she saw the ghost of the old man and fell down the stairs. Then she was trapped down there. Would you want to go back up the stairs when you just saw a dead person behind you. She also new at the end of the basement was a way out to the street.



To respond:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
If I'm not mistaken, she knew that the cellar door leading to the outside was locked, since she locked herself earlier in the film. Personally, Sarah's actions here didn't take me out of the film, since, as you say, the ghost of the old man appeared behind her.


Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:15 pm
Profile
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
jadedmoviegoer wrote:
roastbeef_ajus wrote:
James Berardinelli wrote:

That's it.


Actually, I don't think it was dumb, and my following explanation explains it.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
Well, actually, wasn't Sarah looking for Rease Jones? She opened the basement door to call to her, and when she turned around she saw the ghost of the old man and fell down the stairs. Then she was trapped down there. Would you want to go back up the stairs when you just saw a dead person behind you. She also new at the end of the basement was a way out to the street.



To respond:

[Reveal] Spoiler:
If I'm not mistaken, she knew that the cellar door leading to the outside was locked, since she locked herself earlier in the film. Personally, Sarah's actions here didn't take me out of the film, since, as you say, the ghost of the old man appeared behind her.


Agreed.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
She wasn't about to go down into the basement until the ghost showed up behind her, pretty much forcing her down. It didn't take me out of the moment at all.


Fri Feb 03, 2012 6:07 pm
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
I saw this through On Demand early in the year, and I wanted to like it much more than I actually did. There's a lot in the film to admire; the characters are memorable, the direction is well-handled, and there is a nice sense of slow, creeping tension present throughout most of the running length. My main problem is one that also plagued The House Of The Devil; mainly, there is a large amount of build-up to surprisingly little payoff (It doesn't help that I watched the trailer beforehand, which literally gives away all the legitimate scares). Like The House Of The Devil, a significant amount of time is spent gearing up the audience for the moment when everything explodes, but instead the film ends in an anticlimax.

With that said, Ti West is definitely an interesting filmmaker; I really appreciate his more classical approach to horror cinema, and I think eventually he is going to make a really great horror film. The Innkeepers falls a little short, but there's still enough strong material there to make it worth seeing. 6/10.


Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:23 pm
Site Admin

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:55 pm
Posts: 2800
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ, USA
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
Blonde Almond wrote:
(It doesn't help that I watched the trailer beforehand, which literally gives away all the legitimate scares).


Agree with this. It's a major problem with the trailer, which should not be watched before seeing the movie. In fact, the trailer includes the final moment of the film. Out of context, it doesn't stand out, but I was surprised to see it included.


Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:16 pm
Profile WWW
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
James Berardinelli wrote:
Blonde Almond wrote:
(It doesn't help that I watched the trailer beforehand, which literally gives away all the legitimate scares).


Agree with this. It's a major problem with the trailer, which should not be watched before seeing the movie. In fact, the trailer includes the final moment of the film. Out of context, it doesn't stand out, but I was surprised to see it included.

The trailer for Quarantine(the REC remake) had the exact same problem, hell the image on the poster was of the final scene in the film.


Sat Feb 04, 2012 3:54 pm
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
jadedmoviegoer wrote:
I think this movie seems to have been made for the on-demand format. If I were to see this on the big screen, I would probably feel unsatisfied, but on the small screen it is a great way to spend an hour and forty minutes on a weekend evening.


I disagree. Horror/thrillers that are done well (as this one is) and comedies that are actually funny, are two of the genres that benefit from seeing with an audience. The crowd reaction definitely enhances the experience, IMO.


Sun Feb 05, 2012 5:13 am
Second Unit Director

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:13 am
Posts: 328
Post Re: THE INNKEEPERS
MunichMan wrote:
jadedmoviegoer wrote:
I think this movie seems to have been made for the on-demand format. If I were to see this on the big screen, I would probably feel unsatisfied, but on the small screen it is a great way to spend an hour and forty minutes on a weekend evening.


I disagree. Horror/thrillers that are done well (as this one is) and comedies that are actually funny, are two of the genres that benefit from seeing with an audience. The crowd reaction definitely enhances the experience, IMO.


While horror movies can work well in a crowd, like paranormal activity, I think "The Innkeepers" will try the patience of a mainstream audience. Have you ever sat in a movie theater where you can feel audience around you shifting in their seats?

I generally avoid comedies in theaters. I always feel that laughter occurs reflexively whenever the audience laughs, even though on second thought I often don't find the material that funny. For me, It's easier to determine the quality of the humor at home.


Mon Feb 06, 2012 3:14 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.
Translated by Xaphos © 2007, 2008, 2009 phpBB.fr