Discussion of movies and ReelThoughts topics

It is currently Fri Jul 11, 2014 1:17 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939 
Author Message
Post 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
James review - 4 stars

For veteran director Victor Fleming, who began making movies during the black-and-white, silent era, 1939 represented the pinnacle of his career. Not only did Fleming's Gone with the Wind claim the Best Picture Oscar, but his other big feature, The Wizard of Oz, took its first steps towards becoming one of American cinema's best-known and most beloved motion pictures. (It's worth noting that Fleming had help from several other directors on Gone with the Wind and The Wizard of Oz, but, in the end, he was given sole credit for both.) Indeed, The Wizard of Oz is one of only a handful of films that nearly everyone is familiar with.

Throughout the years, there have been dozens of live-action films, stage plays, animated features, and TV programs based on L. Frank Baum's classic Oz stories. To one degree or another, almost all have been influenced by Fleming's telling of the tale. Although the 1939 version was not the first filmed adaptation of the book (the Internet Movie Database lists at least two silent movies, including one with Oliver Hardy as the Tin Man, that preceded Fleming's), it is without a doubt the definitive one. When anyone thinks of The Wizard of Oz, they see Judy Garland, Ray Bolger, Bert Lahr, and Jack Haley, and hear "Somewhere over the Rainbow" and "Follow the Yellow Brick Road."

1998 has already seen a theatrical re-release of Gone with the Wind, and now The Wizard of Oz joins it. This version of Oz is being touted as a "Special Edition," although those expecting to see new scenes of Toto gnawing at the Scarecrow's legs or Dorothy playing Hide-and-Seek with the Munchkins will be disappointed. No extra material has been added. The print looks great, but the Technicolor was already re-invigorated for a previous laserdisc release. The only really noticeable improvement this time around is the soundtrack, which has been converted from the original mono to digital surround sound. Still, is that enough to justify calling this a "Special Edition?"

Probably the most interesting aspect of The Wizard of Oz comes from interpreting what really happens during the bulk of the film. The story opens by introducing us to Dorothy Gale (Judy Garland), a young girl in Kansas who finds her wanderlust stirred by dreams of going "somewhere over the rainbow." When a tornado strikes the farm where she lives with her aunt and uncle, she is knocked unconscious. Upon waking up, she finds herself in the magical land of Oz, where she journeys in the company of a Scarecrow (Ray Bolger), a Tin Man (Jack Haley), and a Cowardly Lion (Bert Lahr) to defeat the Wicked Witch of the West (Margaret Hamilton) and find the all-powerful Wizard (Frank Morgan), who has the power to send her home. But is this a real trip, or is it all a dream? A strong case can be developed for either possibility, although it's ultimately up to each viewer to make up his or her own mind. Whichever way you lean, it doesn't detract from the movie's boundless capacity to entertain.

The Wizard of Oz belongs in that exclusive category of films capable of equally enchanting children and adults. In fact, the basic formula was so successful in The Wizard of Oz that Disney borrowed it as the framework for their recent wave of animated pictures. If there's something familiar about the structure of The Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, etc., that's because the approach of mixing light comedy and adventure with catchy musical tunes (while frontloading the music and concentrating on adventure late in the story) is not original. Recognizing how well Oz played to all audiences, Disney adapted the skeleton of the classic for their own use.

Of course, there's more going on in Oz than just that. At the core of the story is a theme that speaks to children and adults in similar, yet different, ways. Dorothy's dream may be to travel to a far off land, but, when she finds herself there, all she wants is to go home - to a place where she's safe, loved, and warm. This is a dilemma that all children face - the desire to cut the apron strings balanced by the overpowering yearning for the comfortable and familiar. As adults, we can watch The Wizard of Oz and fondly remember our own pilgrimage from childhood to adulthood and how, in many ways, it mirrors the one Dorothy is taking.

Another aspect of The Wizard of Oz that immediately arrests the attention is the film's use of black-and-white (actually brown-and-white) and the vivid hues of Technicolor. All of the scenes that transpire in our mundane world are presented in the most drab manner possible, but, when the setting shifts to Oz, the grays and browns are replaced by brilliant reds, blues, oranges, and yellows. It takes a rare movie to make a viewer even think of it as "black and white" or "color," but, because The Wizard of Oz puts meaning into appearance (much like the recently-released Pleasantville), the nature of the visual composition become crucial.

The special effects in The Wizard of Oz do not look like the special effects in Armageddon or Godzilla. No computer animation was used, so they're far less elegant. In many cases, they look like special effects. You can see where the yellow brick road ends and the matte painting begins. When the Scarecrow has been torn apart, you know exactly where Bolger's body is. The Wizard's balloon is clearly not real. It doesn't matter, though. These effects are good enough to sketch the outline; our minds fill in the rest. The Wizard of Oz takes on a life in our head that it never quite attains on the screen. Because of the power of imagination, the film transcends the limitations of the techniques used to craft it.

Over the years, The Wizard of Oz has been subjected to the kind of scrutiny reserved for only the greatest of motion pictures. Volumes have been written about it, analyzing everything from its look to the urban legends that have sprung up around it. (The best known, that there's an electrocuted stage hand in the background of a forest scene, has been thoroughly debunked.) Ultimately, however, it doesn't take a lengthy study to understand why multiple generations find the movie so compelling. Not only is it wonderfully entertaining, but the issues it addresses, and the way it presents them, are both universal and deeply personal. And therein lies The Wizard of Oz's true magic.


Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:27 am
Cinematographer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:17 pm
Posts: 529
Post Re: 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
There is little to be said about this film that hasn't already been said. I grew up with this film. The fantastic technicolor musicale that this is is something that will live on forever. Who could forget the ever-spoofed "I'm melting! I'm melting!" sequence? Judy Garland's best known role?

I don't know though. When it came out, no one had ever seen anything like this. It is similar to the director's other major accomplishment, Gone With the Wind, but it goes in a completely different direction. For me, it's kind of lost its magic over the years. You have to admit, it is pretty dumb. It regained popularity in recent years due to the book+musical Wicked. Overall, I just think that this was meant more for entertainment than anything else. Which is why the acid trip aspect is so interesting. It gives this movie some depth.


Wed Jul 22, 2009 3:11 am
Profile
Post Re: 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
darthyoshi wrote:
For me, it's kind of lost its magic over the years. You have to admit, it is pretty dumb.


I will admit no such thing! ;)

I've seen it 4 or 5 times now and it's always been a magical experience for me. The last time I saw it was less than a year ago and I liked it even more than before. The dialogue is, in my opinion, really wonderful and an oft overlooked part of the movie.


Wed Jul 29, 2009 1:07 pm
Cinematographer
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:17 pm
Posts: 529
Post Re: 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
ed_metal_head wrote:
darthyoshi wrote:
For me, it's kind of lost its magic over the years. You have to admit, it is pretty dumb.


I will admit no such thing! ;)

I've seen it 4 or 5 times now and it's always been a magical experience for me. The last time I saw it was less than a year ago and I liked it even more than before. The dialogue is, in my opinion, really wonderful and an oft overlooked part of the movie.


Don't mind me, I'm just a scrooge. Not only do I think the Wizard of Oz is dumb, but I hate the holidays, and I'm sick of Disneyland. Seriously. I would take Fight Club over The Wizard of Oz any day of the week, even Wednesday.

*this post is supposed to be somewhat silly*


Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:09 am
Profile
Post Re: 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
This is definitely one of my favorite films. I love the music and performances. I've seen it like 10 times since I was a kid, but not until last year when I watched it again did I realize just how much I enjoyed this movie each and every time I watch it.

(**** out of ****)


Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:55 pm
Post Re: 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
I don't think I'll be seeing this one before my daughter is interested (that gives me at least a few Oz-free years) but I'm not not looking forward to watching it again for the 100,000th time. It's been, what?, 20 years since I last tuned in? My memories of this one are all positive, as they are for most viewers. It's just that I've seen it at least a few times over too many to ever want to see it again.

But... I miss laserdiscs. The Criterion Collection had a lovely multiple disc package that was dedicated to nothing but Oz, all the time. If I could get back all of my movie-free years I'd purchase that Pioneer laserdisc player with the 10+ discs that was offered to me at ~$200. I kick myself once in a while for not shelling out the dough... it's a dead medium, I know, but there were some incredible packages out there. The Boogie Nights LD had an excerpt from a porn documentary with commentary by Paul Thomas Anderson, for example. DVD is better, of course, but I still like the exclusivity of those big, unwieldy platters. Sigh. Nostalgia for a time I never really had any part in.

Back to Oz: it's a good film, more memory than film for me and, I suspect, many other people. Watching it now would bring me back to my old basement, the cheapie Zenith big screen. It would be great to see the movie for the very first time as an adult.


Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:29 am
Post Re: 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
I have an opportunity to see “The Wizard of Oz” at the Al Ringling Theater* in about a week.

http://www.alringling.com/

Does anyone have any thoughts about whether this movie might be alright for younger viewers, specifically 3yr old and 5yr old girls?? I’d like to take them, but don’t want to give them nightmares. It’s been a LONG time since I saw it…


*I bicycled across WI a couple of weeks ago and ‘found’ this fantastic theater. I’m pretty excited to go inside it.


Fri Oct 01, 2010 5:32 pm
Post Re: 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
Awf Hand wrote:
I have an opportunity to see “The Wizard of Oz” at the Al Ringling Theater* in about a week.

http://www.alringling.com/

Does anyone have any thoughts about whether this movie might be alright for younger viewers, specifically 3yr old and 5yr old girls?? I’d like to take them, but don’t want to give them nightmares. It’s been a LONG time since I saw it…


*I bicycled across WI a couple of weeks ago and ‘found’ this fantastic theater. I’m pretty excited to go inside it.


I saw the movie for the first time when I was about that age. I remember the closeup of the Wicked Witch scaring the shit out of me, but I loved it nonetheless. I say it's an essential movie for children to see. They may be slightly spooked, but they'll still likely be enthralled.


Fri Oct 01, 2010 10:48 pm
Post Re: 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
PeachyPete wrote:
Awf Hand wrote:
I have an opportunity to see “The Wizard of Oz” at the Al Ringling Theater* in about a week.

http://www.alringling.com/

Does anyone have any thoughts about whether this movie might be alright for younger viewers, specifically 3yr old and 5yr old girls?? I’d like to take them, but don’t want to give them nightmares. It’s been a LONG time since I saw it…


*I bicycled across WI a couple of weeks ago and ‘found’ this fantastic theater. I’m pretty excited to go inside it.


I saw the movie for the first time when I was about that age. I remember the closeup of the Wicked Witch scaring the shit out of me, but I loved it nonetheless. I say it's an essential movie for children to see. They may be slightly spooked, but they'll still likely be enthralled.


I was never spooked, I was always enthralled with that movie. Of course, I was also the kid who got mad when my parents covered my eyes in The Lost World: Jurassic Park when the guy was eaten in half (I'm still bitter about that).


Sat Oct 02, 2010 4:58 pm
Post Re: 62 Wizard of Oz, The 1939
Awf Hand wrote:
I have an opportunity to see “The Wizard of Oz” at the Al Ringling Theater* in about a week.

http://www.alringling.com/

Does anyone have any thoughts about whether this movie might be alright for younger viewers, specifically 3yr old and 5yr old girls?? I’d like to take them, but don’t want to give them nightmares. It’s been a LONG time since I saw it…


*I bicycled across WI a couple of weeks ago and ‘found’ this fantastic theater. I’m pretty excited to go inside it.


Go for it. Possible sources of fright are The Witch and the flying monkeys. The latter might be even worse than the witch. However, I think your kids should be alright. And I'm hoping you'll like it even more than them. I rewatched this a year or so ago and was amazed by how much I loved it. The dialogue is just superb. Easily one of the greatest films of all time.


Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:54 am
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.
Translated by Xaphos © 2007, 2008, 2009 phpBB.fr