
Re: Poll #24: Alice in Chains
- When did alternative become oversaturated? As far as I'm concerned, most alternative bands of the 90's caught on solely by making hook-filled, inventive rock. This was the staple of the era, and I think that was a laudable standard. It's always been a solid sub-genre, and it remained vital for much longer than hair metal, which was even at it's best a joke sub-genre. It's also arguable, due to the subgenre's subjective nature, that Alternative has never dipped in quality and has expanded to other genres in this decade. That's what happens when a genre is founded upon musical principles and not industry tit-flicking.
- I'll take your opinion on Emo seriously when I say 'Sunny Day Real Estate' and you don't ask me for Mapquest directions.
- Grunge most certainly was overdone, but a mass of material from it's peak has weathered the test of time, whereas almost all of hair metal has not. Many of the records from this era don't even sound like they were made in the 90's, and are timeless classics (hell, even 'Ten' sounds modern with it's recent remastering).
Example: Give an amateur listener a taste of 'Siamese Dream' and then ask them to guess the release date. The answer, 1993, almost seems like a bold-faced lie.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're absolutely entitled to your singularly different opinions, and to some bizarro-world degree I respect them, but I will go on a limb here and say that if I woke up as you the next morning, I would stay away from any and all media devices in my house.