Discussion of movies and ReelThoughts topics

It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 7:01 am





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
BATTLE LOS ANGELES 
Author Message
Site Admin

Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 10:55 pm
Posts: 2775
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ, USA
Post BATTLE LOS ANGELES
Click here for the review of Battle Los Angeles

SPOILERS must be tagged with the "SPOILER" tag!


Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:08 pm
Profile WWW
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
Gotta be honest, Independence Day is one of the most entertaining movies I've ever seen.


Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:14 pm
Director
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:54 pm
Posts: 1484
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
Two and two halves...does that make it three?

_________________
I am a Leaf on the Wind. Watch Me Soar
---
http://www.leafontheweb.com


Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:18 pm
Profile
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
firefly wrote:
Two and two halves...does that make it three?


It does...but where do you see two halves?


Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:20 pm
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
Patrick wrote:
firefly wrote:
Two and two halves...does that make it three?


It does...but where do you see two halves?


On the homepage, it looks like 3 1/2 stars and 2 1/2 stars mated and had a kid, which James then awarded to this movie. I was a little confused myself.


Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:25 pm
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
thered47 wrote:
Patrick wrote:
firefly wrote:
Two and two halves...does that make it three?


It does...but where do you see two halves?


On the homepage, it looks like 3 1/2 stars and 2 1/2 stars mated and had a kid, which James then awarded to this movie. I was a little confused myself.


Oh, I see it now. The review page itself only shows 2 1/2


Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:27 pm
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
I too was confused by the 2 and 2 halves star rating, but based on the review I'm guessing only 2.5 stars was intended?


Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:10 am
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
Well if lack of character development is the only major flaw, then i'm definitely seeing this. I felt much the same way about Inception that you felt about this film, it was diverting and mildly engaging at first, but eventually it got tiresome and I had a tough time caring about any of the characters(particularly Ellen Page, since her character is little more then a mouthpiece for exposition)


Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:42 am
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
In the trailer, the aliens are flying all over the place and they show one big mother of an airship in the last trailer scene. Why does JB say they have no air support and are entirely ground-based? Does not compute.


Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:58 am
Director

Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 11:04 am
Posts: 1379
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
It's funny. I hear keep hearing this movie being compared to Black Hawk Down which was a great movie despite the fact that that wasn't very strong on character development either.

Looking forward to it although the fact that it's from the director of Texas Chainsaw Massacre The Beginning doesn't strike one with too much confidence. That movie was awful. But this does look like a MAJOR step up for him.


Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:40 am
Profile
Second Unit Director

Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:52 pm
Posts: 240
Location: North Carolina
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
Looks like Netflix for me.


Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:19 am
Profile
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
MunichMan wrote:
In the trailer, the aliens are flying all over the place and they show one big mother of an airship in the last trailer scene. Why does JB say they have no air support and are entirely ground-based? Does not compute.


Not in the movie itself?


Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:31 am
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
2 1/2 stars?!! Noooo!!! This movie was supposed to be awesome! I feel like a deflated balloon. I've been looking forward to it forever -- wishing and hoping it would be awesome. And the trailers look so kick ass! What a shame. I'll probably go see it this weekend regardless but now my expectations have been checked a bit.

tcb


Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:12 pm
Second Unit Director

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 4:13 am
Posts: 328
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
spencerworth34 wrote:
Gotta be honest, Independence Day is one of the most entertaining movies I've ever seen.


I second that. It is an event movie that has yet to be equaled. Ebert has a great half-star review: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbc ... 992/-1/RSS.


Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:39 pm
Profile
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
"Hand held camera" is the signature that signs me off.


Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:20 pm
Gaffer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 12:31 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Bay City, Michigan
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
jadedmoviegoer wrote:
spencerworth34 wrote:
Gotta be honest, Independence Day is one of the most entertaining movies I've ever seen.


I second that. It is an event movie that has yet to be equaled. Ebert has a great half-star review: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbc ... 992/-1/RSS.

I disregard what Ebert thinks about SciFi anymore. In his review of Trek '09 and what he wrote on his Twitter about this movie it appears he will only like a movie labeled as Science Fiction if the film meets and abides by all current scientific standards.

You know like.... "a black hole would never behave that way" or "the aliens have guns growing out of their bodies, that would never happen".


Thu Mar 10, 2011 6:49 pm
Profile WWW
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
Anthony S. Lewis wrote:
jadedmoviegoer wrote:
spencerworth34 wrote:
Gotta be honest, Independence Day is one of the most entertaining movies I've ever seen.


I second that. It is an event movie that has yet to be equaled. Ebert has a great half-star review: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbc ... 992/-1/RSS.

I disregard what Ebert thinks about SciFi anymore. In his review of Trek '09 and what he wrote on his Twitter about this movie it appears he will only like a movie labeled as Science Fiction if the film meets and abides by all current scientific standards.

You know like.... "a black hole would never behave that way" or "the aliens have guns growing out of their bodies, that would never happen".


Ebert doesn't like the new Star Trek? For what possible reason?


Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:10 pm
Director
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 1077
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
Dragonbeard wrote:
"Hand held camera" is the signature that signs me off.


Amen to that.


Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:24 pm
Profile
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
This review says all I need to know about the film(on a side note, Ebert's review was one of the worst pieces of shit i've ever read! :evil: :roll: I'm beginning to think that he should just retire already, as he dosen't even sound like he's trying anymore)
http://www.joblo.com/arrow/reviews.php?id=1425


Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:09 pm
Post Re: BATTLE LOS ANGELES
Meh.


Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:18 pm
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.
Translated by Xaphos © 2007, 2008, 2009 phpBB.fr