Discussion of movies and ReelThoughts topics

It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 3:03 pm





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
What movies should be remade or deserve sequels? 
Author Message
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
johnny larue wrote:
neco82 wrote:
calvero wrote:
The Vikings


Rather than remake it, why don't they just make more viking movies? They have all the elements for massive, bloody epics. I've always wondered why they aren't used more often... and most viking movies are pretty shit (Pathfinder... ugh.)


Did we NOT just get Thor?!?! :D


There were no vikings in Thor. Americans, Asgardians and Frost Giants set in the present. Not a marauding Scandinavian warrior in sight.


Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:24 pm
Cinematographer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:40 pm
Posts: 722
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
I would also like to see the film versions of the sequels to "Once Were Warriors." They made a movie out of the first one, "What Becomes of the Broken Hearted," but I can't find a copy. :(

_________________
My movie review site:

Mighty Mike's Raging Reviews

http://mightymikesragingreviews.blogspot.com/


Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:00 pm
Profile WWW
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
I've been holding my breath for the next Remo Williams.
Ditto, Buckaroo Bonzai.

I want a modern remake of "Capricorn One" or maybe "The Martian Chronicles".


Tue Sep 06, 2011 10:10 am
Director
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:04 am
Posts: 1249
Location: Lancashire, England.
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
moviemkr7 wrote:
I would also like to see the film versions of the sequels to "Once Were Warriors." They made a movie out of the first one, "What Becomes of the Broken Hearted," but I can't find a copy. :(


I watched this on Youtube. Someone had loaded 10, ten minute parts up.

_________________
The question, RAYMOND ... is what.. did you want.. to be?


Thu Sep 08, 2011 5:01 am
Profile
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
The Magnificent Ambersons

According to some, the original cut to Orson Welles follow up to Citizen Kane was actually superior to what many call "The Greatest Film Of Them All". However, RKO freaked out when they screened it and got a negative test audience reaction. Ho hum. But after editing it, some jackass went and destroyed the parts that were cut, thereby preventing any kind of restoration using the original material.

Therefore one cannot help but wonder if a remake, using the original script - which reportedly still exists, would look like. Could a top notch director actually manage to top Citizen Kane?
-Jeremy


Fri Sep 30, 2011 4:57 pm
Critic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 5882
Location: Easton, MD
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
thered47 wrote:
The Magnificent Ambersons

According to some, the original cut to Orson Welles follow up to Citizen Kane was actually superior to what many call "The Greatest Film Of Them All". However, RKO freaked out when they screened it and got a negative test audience reaction. Ho hum. But after editing it, some jackass went and destroyed the parts that were cut, thereby preventing any kind of restoration using the original material.

Therefore one cannot help but wonder if a remake, using the original script - which reportedly still exists, would look like. Could a top notch director actually manage to top Citizen Kane?
-Jeremy


Are you aware that this was done a couple years ago with his shooting script?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252147/

_________________
I'm lithe and fierce as a tiger


Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:02 pm
Profile
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
JamesKunz wrote:
thered47 wrote:
The Magnificent Ambersons

According to some, the original cut to Orson Welles follow up to Citizen Kane was actually superior to what many call "The Greatest Film Of Them All". However, RKO freaked out when they screened it and got a negative test audience reaction. Ho hum. But after editing it, some jackass went and destroyed the parts that were cut, thereby preventing any kind of restoration using the original material.

Therefore one cannot help but wonder if a remake, using the original script - which reportedly still exists, would look like. Could a top notch director actually manage to top Citizen Kane?
-Jeremy


Are you aware that this was done a couple years ago with his shooting script?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252147/


From what I understand, it still has pretty much the same happy ending as the Welles original.


Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:41 pm
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
JamesKunz wrote:
thered47 wrote:
The Magnificent Ambersons

According to some, the original cut to Orson Welles follow up to Citizen Kane was actually superior to what many call "The Greatest Film Of Them All". However, RKO freaked out when they screened it and got a negative test audience reaction. Ho hum. But after editing it, some jackass went and destroyed the parts that were cut, thereby preventing any kind of restoration using the original material.

Therefore one cannot help but wonder if a remake, using the original script - which reportedly still exists, would look like. Could a top notch director actually manage to top Citizen Kane?
-Jeremy


Are you aware that this was done a couple years ago with his shooting script?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252147/


Yes, I heard of it, but a TV miniseries and movie are two different beasts. I mean, I don't know if this was done for the miniseries, but this project would most benefit from Gus Van Sant's Psycho technique, except in cases of what was reshot by RKO, and using Welles style for the sections that were cut out and destroyed.
-Jeremy


Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:18 pm
Critic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 5882
Location: Easton, MD
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
thered47 wrote:
JamesKunz wrote:
thered47 wrote:
The Magnificent Ambersons

According to some, the original cut to Orson Welles follow up to Citizen Kane was actually superior to what many call "The Greatest Film Of Them All". However, RKO freaked out when they screened it and got a negative test audience reaction. Ho hum. But after editing it, some jackass went and destroyed the parts that were cut, thereby preventing any kind of restoration using the original material.

Therefore one cannot help but wonder if a remake, using the original script - which reportedly still exists, would look like. Could a top notch director actually manage to top Citizen Kane?
-Jeremy


Are you aware that this was done a couple years ago with his shooting script?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0252147/


Yes, I heard of it, but a TV miniseries and movie are two different beasts. I mean, I don't know if this was done for the miniseries, but this project would most benefit from Gus Van Sant's Psycho technique, except in cases of what was reshot by RKO, and using Welles style for the sections that were cut out and destroyed.
-Jeremy


Well it was a TV film, not a miniseries, but I think I know what you mean

_________________
I'm lithe and fierce as a tiger


Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:34 pm
Profile
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
JamesKunz wrote:
Well it was a TV film, not a miniseries, but I think I know what you mean


Okay, I thought what I read earlier used the term "miniseries" but yeah, there is still a bit of a difference.
-Jeremy


Sat Oct 01, 2011 10:52 pm
Cinematographer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 10:40 pm
Posts: 722
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
Ghost and the Darkness: Due to a pedestrian script, incompetent direction and a lazy performance by Michael Douglas (who ironically was one of the executive producers), this monster flick was a dud instead of the monster classic it could have been.

Pontypool: Again, a script matters. This is the Orson Welles War of the Worlds scenario come to life, but the script is badly unfocused. It's a creepy experience with good performances, but it makes no sense.

_________________
My movie review site:

Mighty Mike's Raging Reviews

http://mightymikesragingreviews.blogspot.com/


Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:11 pm
Profile WWW
Critic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 5882
Location: Easton, MD
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
moviemkr7 wrote:
Ghost and the Darkness: Due to a pedestrian script, incompetent direction and a lazy performance by Michael Douglas (who ironically was one of the executive producers), this monster flick was a dud instead of the monster classic it could have been.

Pontypool: Again, a script matters. This is the Orson Welles War of the Worlds scenario come to life, but the script is badly unfocused. It's a creepy experience with good performances, but it makes no sense.


If the script sucks, why does the Ghost and the Darkness need a remake? It's not like it has a super-compelling premise. It's basically "Jaws with paws," as I once heard it said.

_________________
I'm lithe and fierce as a tiger


Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:29 pm
Profile
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
I've read that Robert Towne had planned to do a third movie in the Chinatown/The Two Jakes series called Cloverleaf, set in the 1950s and which had the creation of the LA freeway as its background (just as Chinatown had the water system and The Two Jakes had oil). It'll never happen, but that doesn't stop me wondering what might have been. Despite the general negative reception it got, I actually like The Two Jakes, and I think it makes a worthy sequel to Chinatown. Just as Chinatown has parallels with Raymond Chandler's fiction, The Two Jakes is very reminiscent of the detective novels of Ross Macdonald in its approach to old family secrets that have an effect on the present.


Thu Dec 01, 2011 1:40 am
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
domani wrote:
I've read that Robert Towne had planned to do a third movie in the Chinatown/The Two Jakes series called Cloverleaf, set in the 1950s and which had the creation of the LA freeway as its background (just as Chinatown had the water system and The Two Jakes had oil). It'll never happen, but that doesn't stop me wondering what might have been. Despite the general negative reception it got, I actually like The Two Jakes, and I think it makes a worthy sequel to Chinatown. Just as Chinatown has parallels with Raymond Chandler's fiction, The Two Jakes is very reminiscent of the detective novels of Ross Macdonald in its approach to old family secrets that have an effect on the present.


Cloverleaf does exist....it's called Who Framed Roger Rabbit.


Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:19 am
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
JamesKunz wrote:
moviemkr7 wrote:
Ghost and the Darkness: Due to a pedestrian script, incompetent direction and a lazy performance by Michael Douglas (who ironically was one of the executive producers), this monster flick was a dud instead of the monster classic it could have been.

Pontypool: Again, a script matters. This is the Orson Welles War of the Worlds scenario come to life, but the script is badly unfocused. It's a creepy experience with good performances, but it makes no sense.


If the script sucks, why does the Ghost and the Darkness need a remake? It's not like it has a super-compelling premise. It's basically "Jaws with paws," as I once heard it said.



I've read the book "The Maneaters of Tsavo" which is the source material for GatD. This is currently the only movie that I owned on VHS and then had to purchase the DVD. I guess it could be said that I have it in triplicate -or more, as I have been to The Field Museum in Chicago to view the exhibit with the actual taxidermied lions on display. -I even have a "Maneaters of Tsavo" mousepad.
The glaring defect that I had always seen in the movie is that no "Remington" (Michael Douglas) character exists in the original story. I had always thought that, for a compelling movie, his character was necessary to provide interaction with the J.H. Patterson (Val Kilmer) character. Until I saw Cast Away I wouldn't have believed that watching a solitary figure on the screen could've been fulfilling in any way.

I don't see a broad enough appeal for a 'purist' retelling of this story, but I would be first in line if they crafted one.


Thu Dec 01, 2011 10:26 am
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
Ghostbusters 3 goddamnit!!!

I know it is in the pipeline, but Billy Murray must be in it... Fuck Murray, why can't you act normally and do this one for all your fans!


Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:15 pm
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
When a Stranger Calls deserves another remake


Thu Dec 01, 2011 3:42 pm
Critic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 5882
Location: Easton, MD
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
roastbeef_ajus wrote:
Ghostbusters 3 goddamnit!!!

I know it is in the pipeline, but Billy Murray must be in it... Fuck Murray, why can't you act normally and do this one for all your fans!


Because even Bill Murray (arguably, especially Bill Murray) knows the original Ghostbusters was pretty mediocre

_________________
I'm lithe and fierce as a tiger


Thu Dec 01, 2011 5:39 pm
Profile
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
JamesKunz wrote:
roastbeef_ajus wrote:
Ghostbusters 3 goddamnit!!!

I know it is in the pipeline, but Billy Murray must be in it... Fuck Murray, why can't you act normally and do this one for all your fans!


Because even Bill Murray (arguably, especially Bill Murray) knows the original Ghostbusters was pretty mediocre


Dude, fuck that. Ghostbusters is an awesome 80s comedy that will never get old.


Thu Dec 01, 2011 6:47 pm
Critic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:35 am
Posts: 5882
Location: Easton, MD
Post Re: What movies should be remade or deserve sequels?
roastbeef_ajus wrote:
JamesKunz wrote:
roastbeef_ajus wrote:
Ghostbusters 3 goddamnit!!!

I know it is in the pipeline, but Billy Murray must be in it... Fuck Murray, why can't you act normally and do this one for all your fans!


Because even Bill Murray (arguably, especially Bill Murray) knows the original Ghostbusters was pretty mediocre


Dude, fuck that. Ghostbusters is an awesome 80s comedy that will never get old.


It's one of the movies which I wish I could enjoy like everybody else seems to. But I just don't think it's that good...

_________________
I'm lithe and fierce as a tiger


Thu Dec 01, 2011 7:27 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ilovemovies and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by Vjacheslav Trushkin for Free Forum/DivisionCore.
Translated by Xaphos © 2007, 2008, 2009 phpBB.fr